CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
VS
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro Plex 2100 S4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 640W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16
+3616%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro Plex 2100 S4
0.346 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
VS
Quadro Plex 2100 S4
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
128
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
Theoretical Performance
133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
G80
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Board Design
260W
TDP
640W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
2
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
3
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
4
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
5
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
6
NVIDIA L4 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
7
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
8
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
9
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
10
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy