Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1785MHz vs 1395MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +251%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
72
1024
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy