NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 and 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1746MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 2
9.999 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+34%
13.41 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Nov 2018
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.02TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
60
56
SM Count
48
3584
Shading Units
3840
224
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
64
448
Tensor Cores
192
56
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
Vega 20
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
