Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4 +2683%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
24
4608
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GT200B
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy