Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+7340%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.181 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
