Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro D700

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro D700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 6GB VRAM FirePro D700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
AMD FirePro D700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (263.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (274W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro D700 +46%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jan 2014
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1370 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
263.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
274W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.313 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy