Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V5800 DVI

Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V5800 DVI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 DVI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
ATI FirePro V5800 DVI 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (74W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +115%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800 DVI
1.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
74W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Juniper
-
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.04 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy