Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V7750

Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V7750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +365%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
512.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
76W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 GL XTX
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.514 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy