Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (2331MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +50%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
H3C Graphics
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Generation 12.1
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.4 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy