Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro W4000

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +87%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Aug 2012
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.8 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy