Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (204W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+236%
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
768
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
204W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
