Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1550MHz vs 1072MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 X2 +3%
2.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Nov 2013
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1006 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1152
48
TMUs
96
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy