Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +2189%
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6350
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Feb 2011
H3C Graphics
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
80
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
19W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.292 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy