Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon HD 6530

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon HD 6530

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6530 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 19.20GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6530 's Advantages
Lower TDP (39W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +357%
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6530
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
May 2011
H3C Graphics
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
19.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
400
48
TMUs
20
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
39W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO (215-0757004)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.627 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy