Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1880MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (205W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700 +263%
8.663 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Nov 2019
H3C Graphics
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
36
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Navi 10
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
10.3 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
205W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy