Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD FireStream 9270 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +98%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2020
FireStream
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
DG1
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
Unknown
256 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy