Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +244%
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
May 2015
H3C Graphics
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
65W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy