Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1550MHz vs 1462MHz)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 +182%
6.737 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Apr 2024
H3C Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
727 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
18
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.7 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net