Home GPU Comparison Intel HD Graphics 2000 vs AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP

Intel HD Graphics 2000 vs AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 2000 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8250 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel HD Graphics 2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 150% (1000MHz vs 400MHz)
AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
80 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 2000
0.096 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8250 IGP +6%
0.102 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
May 2013
HD Graphics
Generation
Temash
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

650 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
48
Shading Units
128
6
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
102.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.400 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Sandy Bridge GT1
GPU Name
Kalindi
-
GPU Variant
Kalindi LP
Generation 6.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.504 billion
Transistors
1.178 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
110 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
8W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy