Intel Arc 140V vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arc 140V and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140V 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arc 140V
+4405%
4.1 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2024
Release Date
Apr 2010
Battlemage
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
System Shared
LPDDR5x
Memory Type
System Shared
64bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
0
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.1 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 2.1
1x eDp 1.5
Outputs
No outputs
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
GPU Name
C89
GPU Variant
MCP89
Xe2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
3 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12.2
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
