CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350
Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (450W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350
+201%
44.44 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Data Center GPU Max 1350
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
96GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
14336
256
TMUs
896
128
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
Process Size
10 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
100 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
450W
900 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M
2
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
4
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M
7
NVIDIA GRID K520 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Related News
1
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
2
It's 2024: This Company Released a Laptop Supporting DOS and Windows 95
3
AMD's Strix Halo Supports Up to 128GB Memory, Clearly Designed for AI Large Language Models
4
AMD to Launch Advanced Ryzen AI PRO Series Soon
5
Intel Delays Lunar Lake Shipment: Postponed from June to September
6
Initial Test Results of AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Revealed: IPC Improvement Meets Expectations
7
Elon Musk Responds to Nvidia’s Jensen Huang: Humanoid Robots Will Be Ten Times More Common than Cars
8
AMD Revives Multi-GPU Support: Up to Four Cards and 192GB VRAM
9
TSMC Explores Advanced Chip Packaging Technology: Switches to Rectangular Substrate, Nearly Tripling Usable Area on 300mm Wafers
10
Western Digital WD Blue SN5000 SSD Launched: Up to 8TB Capacity with Mixed TLC/QLC Flash
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy