CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K80
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K80
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Tesla K80
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 12GB VRAM Tesla K80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 240.6GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K80 's Advantages
Boost Clock824MHz
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+258%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla K80
4.113 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Tesla K80
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
824 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
240.6GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
2496
256
TMUs
208
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.85 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
171.4 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.113 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1371 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK210
-
GPU Variant
GK210-885-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.1 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.7
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
4
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
7
NVIDIA GRID K520 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K1
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
Related News
1
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
2
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
3
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
4
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
5
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
6
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
7
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
8
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
9
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
10
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy