CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro K200M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+4424%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro K200M
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI60
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40s
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy