Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +4424%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy