CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1306MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+782%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID M10 8Q
1.672 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
GRID M10 8Q
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2016
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-570-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
2
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M
4
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound M
5
NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
6
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Instinct MI300A
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy