Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1306MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +782%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID M10 8Q
1.672 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2016
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-570-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy