CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
7616 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+1858%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro K3000M
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
576
256
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K540Q
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy