CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+925%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro K2200
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
68W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA L40S
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Related News
1
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
2
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
3
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
4
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
5
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
6
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
7
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
8
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
9
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
10
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy