CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro K610M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+3822%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro K610M
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
30W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K100
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy