Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+949%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
