CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+949%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro M2000M
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K200
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy