Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
8144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +12615%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
8192
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy