CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (47W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+678%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro P1000
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2017
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
47W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K180Q
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
2
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
3
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
4
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
5
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
6
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
7
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
8
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
9
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
10
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy