Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (47W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +678%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2017
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
47W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy