Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 12GB VRAM RTX A2000 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1200MHz
Lower TDP (70W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +84%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 12 GB
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
8192
Shading Units
3328
256
TMUs
104
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
70W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GA106
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
12 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy