CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1560MHz
Lower TDP (130W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+15%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A3000 Mobile
12.78 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
RTX A3000 Mobile
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
32
8192
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
199.7 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.78 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.78 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
199.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
130W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K8
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K540Q
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy