Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+53%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
64GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
6656
256
TMUs
416
128
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Generation 12.7
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
