Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 1133GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +4%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2019
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
8192
Shading Units
5120
256
TMUs
320
128
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy