Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 6200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Plus Graphics 640
0.845 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0.845 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Plus Graphics 640
515
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
+7%
556
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Plus Graphics 640
233
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
+21%
283
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Sep 2014
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
48
6
ROPs
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
844.8 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU Name
Broadwell GT3e
-
-
-
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Generation 8.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm++
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
