Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Intel GMA X3500

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Intel GMA X3500

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock800MHz
384 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA X3500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Aug 2007
HD Graphics-W
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
FSB

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
8
6
ROPs
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
667.0 MPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.336 GTexel/s
-
-
-
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

15W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Broadwell GT3e
GPU Name
Bearlake
-
GPU Variant
Bearlake (G35)
Generation 8.0
Architecture
Generation 4.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
90 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c
4.4
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy