Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Intel HD Graphics 520

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Intel HD Graphics 520

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores
Intel HD Graphics 520 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (900MHz vs 800MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 +77%
0.614 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 520
0.346 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Sep 2015
HD Graphics-W
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
800 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
24
6
ROPs
3
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.700 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
691.2 GFLOPS
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
86.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Broadwell GT3e
GPU Name
Skylake GT2
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 8.0
Architecture
Generation 9.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm+
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy