Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (1400MHz vs 800MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
0.614 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 320SP +45%
0.896 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jan 2020
HD Graphics-W
Generation
Renoir
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
400 MHz
800 MHz
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
384
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
6
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.792 TFLOPS
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
896.0 GFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
56.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Broadwell GT3e
GPU Name
Renoir
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 8.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
9.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
156 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.0
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy