Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 80EU and a Mobile platform GPU: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1532MHz vs 1300MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU +41%
1.664 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2017
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Integrated
Type
Mobile
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
2GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
64bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
20
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
12 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

26.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
52.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
3.328 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
1.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
416.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy