Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs AMD FirePro A300

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1400MHz vs 905MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU +209%
2.15 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
4.301 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Generation 12.2
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy