CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M
VS
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
NVIDIA GeForce 320M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
+1757%
1.69 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M
0.091 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
VS
GeForce 320M
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
3.379 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.690 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89-EPT
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs ATI Radeon 2100 IGP
2
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs AMD Radeon 760M
3
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
4
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel UHD Graphics G1
5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel HD Graphics 2000
6
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel GMA X3100
8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce 9100
9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel GMA
10
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy