Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Boost Clock784MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB +58%
3.333 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tegra
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
204.8GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
1344
56
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
56
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
52.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
6.666 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.333 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
1.667 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy