Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU vs AMD FirePro A300

NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (921MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Nano GPU
0.236 TFLOPS
FirePro A300 +194%
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tegra
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

640 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
921 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
128
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

14.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
14.74 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
471.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
235.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
7.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM20B
GPU Name
Devastator
TM660M-A2
GPU Variant
A300
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
20 nm
Process Size
32 nm
2 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
5.3
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy