Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU vs AMD FirePro A320

NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU vs AMD FirePro A320

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (955MHz vs 921MHz)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Nano GPU
0.236 TFLOPS
FirePro A320 +210%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tegra
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

640 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
921 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
128
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
14.74 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
471.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
235.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
7.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

10W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GM20B
GPU Name
Devastator
TM660M-A2
GPU Variant
A320
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
20 nm
Process Size
32 nm
2 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
5.3
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy