Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (34.14GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 42W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB +855%
0.64 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2008
Tegra
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
34.14GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
32
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
16
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
1280 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
640.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
320.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

10W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.289 billion
Unknown
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy