Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1.28 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +1667%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Dec 2021
Tegra
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
64GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
6656
32
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
58.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy