NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1.28 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+544%
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Tegra
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
32
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
