Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA L20 vs AMD FirePro W9000

NVIDIA L20 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM L20 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA L20 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (274W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
L20 +1385%
59.35 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
L20
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
92
SM Count
-
11776
Shading Units
2048
368
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
368
Tensor Cores
-
92
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

322.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
927.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
59.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
59.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
927.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
274W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Tahiti
AD102
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy