Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA L20 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA L20 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM L20 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA L20 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2520MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
10880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
L20 +1888%
59.35 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
L20
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Apr 2019
Tesla Ada
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
92
SM Count
14
11776
Shading Units
896
368
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
32
368
Tensor Cores
-
92
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

322.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
927.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
59.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
59.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
927.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
TU117
AD102
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy