Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA L40 CNX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA L40 CNX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM L40 CNX and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA L40 CNX 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
18144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
L40 CNX +112362%
89.97 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla Ada
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
2475 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
4
18176
Shading Units
32
568
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
8
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

475.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
1406 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
89.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
89.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1406 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
G84
AD102-???-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
80 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy